Dion Fortune, the Star in the East, and the Sermon on the Mount - Part 2
91 years ago to the day, Dion Fortune gave a talk to a Theosophical Lodge in the Southeast of England. This second part in a series of three blogs is based on notes
taken of that talk by someone who attended the lecture. Providing some insight into what was happening at the time in her battle with the Star in the East, mentioned in Part 1, this is probably best approached by using your
imagination and entering into the experience in the same manner as a
guided visualisation. You may also wish to spend some time afterwards reflecting on its content and how you reacted to it.
Similarly, some prior background reading of the 20th chapter in Gareth Knight’s biography, Dion Fortune and the Inner Light, may also provide supplementary pointers on the "warfare" against the Star of the East, one of the key themes in the talk.
The third post, to follow shortly, will elucidate in more detail some of the esoteric teaching alluded to within the Sermon on the Mount.
Similarly, some prior background reading of the 20th chapter in Gareth Knight’s biography, Dion Fortune and the Inner Light, may also provide supplementary pointers on the "warfare" against the Star of the East, one of the key themes in the talk.
The third post, to follow shortly, will elucidate in more detail some of the esoteric teaching alluded to within the Sermon on the Mount.
* * *
To start off with, imagine
yourself sitting comfortably in the audience attending a
lecture being given this evening by Dion Fortune at a Theosophical Lodge in the Southeast of
England. The subject is The Attitude of the Theosophical Society towards
Christianity.
Dion Fortune stands upright
and begins her talk. The first point she makes is a viewpoint that in the days when Madame Blavatsky
founded the Theosophical Society there was a very general reaction against
religion in completeness, and that the earlier Theosophists shared in the bias of
the times. She postulates that spiritual life was then and is now at a low ebb in European
countries, and many people, estranged from Christianity by an un-Christian
presentation of its teachings, as a reaction, seek spiritual illumination in
others of the great world religions. Therefore, it is that Theosophy has gained
itself a reputation for being anti-Christian.
She denies emphatically, however, that
it is anti-Christian, and maintains that the liberal policy pursued by the
Society recognises that all religions are paths to God, and, although the study
of Western religious thought has been carried on in the Society to the same
extent as the study of Eastern religious thought, there is nothing in the
Constitution or policy of the Society which debars this from being done. In fact, she says, it is not the fault of the
Theosophical Society or the Christians in it if the Christian religion has not
received its just due. Theosophy teaches
that all religions are restatements of fundamental truths made by divine
Messengers sent periodically to this earth to remind humans of God's law and
give out further spiritual teaching as the world became ready to receive
it. Therefore, all religions agree as to
the basic truths they teach, and are only different in the methods of
presentation of these truths; such methods being adapted to the race and time
which the teaching came. This liberal doctrine, she tells the audience, is what
she considers to be one of the best gifts of Theosophy to the world.
She pauses before continuing by saying
that in its birth, Theosophy reminded the Western world of forgotten truths,
truths which had been well-known in our hemisphere from when the great Mystery
Schools of Greece and of Egypt were in their prime, and in which the East had
always retained as part of its traditional faith. It declares that the whole of religious life
and thought does not lie upon the surface, but that, in addition to the simple
teaching which meet the needs of simple souls, there are depths in every
religion which profound thought and experience of the spiritual life can plumb.
In essence, she continues, three types
of teaching can be distinguished in the Christian Gospels; the simple ethical
teaching of the parables which our Lord gave to those who gathered about him in
the villages and marketplaces; a profound teaching which He gave to those who
followed Him out of the towns into the wilderness, and which culminated in the
Sermon on the Mount, universally recognised as “the loftiest spiritual teaching
known to the world”; and finally, teaching which was never written down or
recorded, the teaching which He gave to His disciples in the “Upper Chamber”
saying, “To you it is given to know the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God.” She emphasises that He taught them for 40
days after His resurrection, but that that teaching was not recorded in the
Orthodox Canon of Scripture. There existed, nevertheless, a curious Gnostic
Gospel called the, “Pistis Sophia,” which was said to contain the teaching thus
given, and her view is that this teaching had a very great deal in common with esoteric side of
the religions of the East, and also of the Qabalah, which constituted the
Secret Doctrine of Israel.
Dion Fortune next suggests that we do
not need to look to the East for teaching on the deeper issues of spiritual
life; there is a great Mystical tradition in Christianity itself, both Catholic
and Protestant. She continues
by citing as “initiates of the Inner Light of the Western Tradition: St
Theresa of Ávila and St Francis of Assisi, among Catholics, and George Fox,
Wesley, Swedenborg, and Jacob Boehme among those outside the orthodox pale.” As evidence of the fact that the real power
behind religion has never been lost, she refers to St Therese of Lisieux, the
young French girl, whose short life during the latter half of the 19th century
showed forth in all its fullness the traditional powers of the Spirit.
She continues by telling the audience
that for those whose early associations with the Christian presentation of the
One Truth had turned them against religion, it might be helpful to seek God by
an Eastern pathway. However, she then postulates that the great majority of
those who seek in Theosophy a deeper interpretation of life than the Churches
afford do not wish so much to change their faith as to understand it better,
and although absolute freedom of thought has always characterised Theosophical
Society and always must if it is to retain its position as an inter-racial
spiritual movement, it is the Christian presentation of its philosophy which
must be developed amongst Christian people if it is to fulfil its mission
successfully. The reason Theosophy has
been so successful in India, she believes, is because it has shown Buddhists
and Hindus the deeper significance of their own faiths. She states that it is
her view that it will never be equally successful in Europe until it takes the
same line with regard to both aspects of the Christian faith and the Jewish
religion, offering opportunities by means of its libraries and study groups for
the followers of those faiths to enter into the deeper mystical aspects of
their own communions, rather than seeking the philosophical and mystical
aspects of religion in Eastern faiths.
The lecture concludes with a short
discussion. One speaker disagrees with Dion
Fortune as to the attention given to Christianity in Theosophical lodges,
declaring that during her own 25-year experience of the Theosophical Society
she has always found that great attention has been paid to it. Dion Fortune cautiously responds that “each
must speak of the Society as he or she finds it.”
Other members of the audience express
warm appreciation of the viewpoint put forward by Dion Fortune and openly agree
with the need for the development of the Christian aspect in the Theosophical
Society.
In reply to another question after the
address, Dion Fortune answers that she has no connection whatsoever with the
Liberal Catholic Church.
When asked how the line of study she has
outlined in a section of her lecture might be followed up by those not able to
attend her lectures in London, she responds that the Christian Mystic Lodge of
the Theosophical Society, of which she is the President, issues its
transactions as a monthly magazine, edited by herself, and that this can be
obtained from the Secretary of the Lodge, 3, Queensborough Terrace, Bayswater,
London W2 at 3d. a copy, or 3s. a year post free.
Intrigued
by what you have heard tonight, you walk off into the evening pondering whether or not you agreed with what you have just heard, and whether you might take some further steps...
* * *
On
August the 3rd 1929, the Order of the Star of the East
was dissolved. Jiddu Krishnamurti, mentioned in Part 1 of this series, had rejected the role that had been
projected upon him. No doubt Dion Fortune felt vindicated, but she had a
new phase of work and different direction to be getting on with.....
I
hope you’ve enjoyed reading this blog. I will aim to post the third in the
series within the next month or so.
"Belief has no place where truth is concerned."
~ J. Krishnamurti
Thank you for posting everything Dion Fortune, waiting for the third part. Greetings all the way from the 'East'. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for that....and greetings back all the way from the "West"!
ReplyDelete